Kamran Mir Hazar
Letter to Editor
Human security key to Afghan
future,
aid agencies advise UN Security
Council
On the anniversary of the fall
of the Taliban exactly five years ago today, member agencies of
the peak aid agency coordinating body here (ACBAR) met with the
President of the United Nations Security Council and UN Member
State ambassadors currently in country investigating the
憇ituation in Afghanistan. Aid agencies expressed their
collective concerns over a spiraling cycle of violence;
insufficient peace and reconstruction strategies; and ongoing
human rights violations and abuses. They shared their concerns
that the international community has had five years to bring
sustainable 憄eace dividends but has over-relied on military
and related solutions. Ever increasing instability and poor
development gains suggest that investments in human security
should now trump 慓lobal
War on Terror (GWOT) national security agendas in the interests
of maintaining international peace and security.
Aid agencies advised the UN
Security Council that the international community抯 assumption
that Afghanistan can be made peaceful through a
combination of military assistance, donor-driven aid, and
Western-style democracy fails to attend to the history, society
and culture of Afghanistan, a country which has witnessed failed
foreign intervention time and again. There is an urgent need at
this time to rethink current strategies in the interests of
preventing the death of even more Afghans, avoiding large-scale
destruction of infrastructure and livelihoods, and increasing
chances that what goes on inside and around Afghanistan抯
borders does not destabilize regional and global peace efforts.
At what is increasing a turning
point in the already tumultuous history of Afghanistan, aid
agencies called upon the UN Security Council to play a lead role
in pushing a human security agenda in Afghanistan. 揑t抯 time to
revisit what we feel is a flawed strategy in Afghanistan. Unless
the root causes of conflict are better addressed, and unless the
Afghan people themselves are encouraged to participate in their
own futures, aid will continue to be compromised and durable
solutions will remain illusive. We warmly welcome the UN
dialoguing directly with us at the highest levels and look
forward to witnessing a real change for the better, said
Kirsten Zaat, spokesperson for the Norwegian Refugee Council
(NRC) in Afghanistan and one of three lead advocates
representing aid agencies at the meeting.
Aid agencies thanked the UN
Security Council for listening to the difficulties faced by
Afghan civilians and civil society alike. 揑nsecurity, despair,
and under-employment have led to perceptions that the government
and the international community are not doing enough, the
corollary is increased sympathy for opposition forces. We trust
the UN Security Council will use our concerns and ideas shared
on behalf of 憌e the peoples to promote human security rather
than continue to act on behalf of many UN Member State
governments who unfortunately but increasingly have a tendency
in the current GWOT climate to promote national security agendas
at all costs, said Zaat.
Aid agencies advised the United
Nations Security Council that while transforming war-torn
Afghanistan into a prosperous democracy is sound in principle,
pushing agendas at speed shuts out the Afghan people and is
therefore undemocratic. 揘oble enterprises such as participatory
democracy take at least a generation to develop and necessarily
must be led by the people themselves. Such approaches are having
a highly destructive effect on already overstretched national
authorities. The Afghan people have their own superior coping
mechanisms and indigenous structures which have enabled them to
help themselves since time immemorial. We would like to see a
situation where Afghan communities themselves are consistently
consulted in good faith. We would like to see the contribution
of civil society better valued, said Zaat.
During the meeting the UN
Security Council was advised that many aid agencies operating
across the country have had to scale down their work due to
insecurity. If this situation persists, communities living in
rural and remote areas will continue to suffer. Instability has
also increased the cost, timeliness and quality of aid delivery.
Aid workers are increasingly losing their lives in Afghanistan
and those working in the south and east report that fighting and
instability is shrinking operations aimed at saving lives and
helping the poorest of the poor. 揟he situation is not getting
better it抯 getting worse and we reminded the UN Security
Council that despite increasing risks, many of us continue to
stay on. We do this only because as global citizens committed to
humanity we feel a sense of obligation to help Afghans in need.
Despite the risks, the aid community is still well represented
throughout Afghanistan but we really need the UN to recognize
what is fast becoming an untenable situation, said Zaat.
While reconstruction and
development projects are being delivered in the north with some
very positive effects, at least half the country is caught in
humanitarian limbo. Armed conflict has escalated over past
months. An estimated 80,000 90,000 Afghans (UNHCR) have been
displaced since July 2006, including into makeshift camps.
However, recent displacement comes on top of ongoing forced
relocation resulting from past conflicts and the current
drought, and the number of Afghans seeking shelter with host
families and friends is still unknown. 揟he communities we work
with - the mums, dads and kids of Afghanistan - are telling us
that ongoing fighting between insurgents and NATO is making life
unbearable. At the same time, we suffer increasingly limited
humanitarian access across broad swaths of the south and east.
Aid agencies have been raising issues around humanitarian space
for more than three years now but to no avail, said Zaat.
Conditions on the ground in the
south and east are not conducive for refugees and IDPs to return
home and the death of civilians due to insurgent homicide
(suicide) bombings and NATO bombardments is of grave concern.
揥e can抰 reach the most vulnerable and we remain fearful that
both crimes against humanity and war crimes are taking place but
our capacity to independently verify such weighty allegations is
seriously compromised by access restrictions. In the interests
of maintaining international peace and security, we have asked
the UN Security Council to ensure all allegations of human
rights violations and abuses are transparently investigated and
accounted for. Impunity is never an option. It breeds the kind
of anger and hatred which compromises an already fragile peace.
International humanitarian law must be respected by all parties
at all times, including during GWOT-related fighting, said Zaat.
Aid agencies advised the UN
Security Council that the expectations of Afghans following the
fall of the Taliban five years ago were rightly optimistic but
in fact unrealistic. Unfortunately, the international community
built expectations even further by committing billions of
dollars and setting up complex, large-scale institutional
programmes which have not benefited enough Afghans to date.
揑t抯 time to get back to basics. Afghans are very frustrated
with never-ending war, lawlessness and poverty. While most
Afghans remain prepared to work in partnership with the
international community, faith is fading fast.
揥e feel that the UN Security
Council has genuinely listened to and deeply felt our concerns.
It抯 now time for all of us to better attend to the human
security of Afghans. Five years after the fall of the Taliban,
that would really give the people something to celebrate, said
Zaat.
The concept of human security focuses on protecting
individuals and communities from threats and risks
associated with violence, poverty, unequal wealth
distribution and human rights violations and abuses more
generally. Aid agencies believe that the key to ensuring
a prosperous future for Afghanistan lies in eschewing
traditional national security policy agendas which over-emphasise
military intervention in order to reduce risks including
where deterrence fails in 憄ost-conflict scenarios.
Rather than focusing on the use of force aids agencies
would like to see the UN Security Council and other
relevant stakeholders place more effort into utilizing
both traditional and innovative non-coercive methods
which attend to the protection and assistance concerns
of Afghans. Human security requires the Afghan people to
be at the centre of their own futures.